A. Defendant 1) In the course of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles, Defendant 1 did not clearly undergo criminal identification procedures by stating that male and female witnesses did not have any verification process as to whether the Defendant was the Defendant and the victim, and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have proved that there was no reasonable doubt as to the part of the Defendant’s assaulting the victim. However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby convicting the Defendant of the charge of assaulting as an ancillary charge. 2) The sentence (two years of imprisonment with labor for eight months) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant

B. It is clear that the Defendant committed the assault against the victim, and there was no room for involvement in the cause of death other than the Defendant’s assault until the victim’s death, and immediately after the assault, the victim’s face, etc. was not found. Thus, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the death resulting in bodily injury, which is the primary charge, by misunderstanding the facts.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실오인 및 법리오해 주장에 관한 판단(예비적 공소사실 유죄 인정 부분) 1 원심의 판단 원심은 그 거시 증거에 의하여 ① 피고인과 피해자는 일행 2명과 함께 2012. 8. 14. 00:00경부터 ‘F’ 주점에서 술을 마시던 중 몸싸움과 말다툼을 하였고, 피해자가 위 주점 영업시간이 끝나 새벽 2시경 위 주점을 나올 때 피고인을 밀쳐 피고인의 와이셔츠 단추 3~4개가 떨어진 사실, ② 그 후 위 주점 업주인 E가 퇴근하던 중 피고인과 피해자가 몸싸움을 하는 것을 보게 되었는데, 그 당시 피고인과 피해자가 욕설을 하면서 손으로 서로 밀치다가 피고인이 피해자를 밀쳐 피해자가 뒤로 넘어져 엉덩방아를 찧었고, 피고인과 피해자가 앉은 상태에서 서로...