When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 22:00 on March 14, 2015, the Defendant entered the main points of “E” operated by the victim D in Busan Jung-gu, Busan, for drinking, but, upon soliciting the victim to return home, the Defendant: (a) saw the victim to “I am home, I am, am dead, and why I am aware of the drinking”; (b) saw the victim to talk, and see, “I am am, am dead, and why I am am aware of the drinking”; (c) so, the Defendant continued to keep the victim in mind, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and I am am am unable to enter the victim’s disturbance by force.” (d) By doing so, the Defendant continued to interfere with the victim’s entry by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of statement, investigation report, application of Acts and subordinate statutes to D;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine for the crime (the circumstances of the crime committed during the period of suspension of execution of punishment are not good, but the degree of interference with business is not much severe, and the violation is taken into account);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;