A. In other words, the Defendant: (a) committed a misunderstanding of facts in China for a five-year period of school life in China; (b) provided a large number of patients with the Defendant’s flag in Korea; and (c) provided treatment to the victims at the time; and (d) did not deceiving the victims of criminal facts in the judgment of the court below; and (b) there was no intention of deception.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below determined that the criminal facts in the judgment of the court below were the criminal intent of deception and deception by the defendant on the grounds of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence legitimately adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant stated in the prosecutor's office that the defendant was learned from Germany in China, not from a college or a specialized institution, and that the defendant was born after the patient and the defendant got out of the floor, and the defendant got out of the patient's body and presented the defendant to the outside of the patient's body. From the perspective of ordinary people, it is difficult to evaluate that the disease of heavy evidence might be improved by simply taking out the patient's body, not from a traditional one-way treatment method such as invasion and math, but from a special institution, the victim did not have the effect of improving the health of the defendant during the middle of nine months since he did not appear to have been under the influence of improving the health of the defendant.