설계비용
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On March 21, 2014, the Plaintiff asserts that, through Defendant and C’s agent D, the Defendant and C entered into a design and permission service contract for the construction of a factory building on the land outside E and one parcel in Chungcheong City, and completed the service on August 14, 2014, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 17,850,000 for that contract.
On the other hand, the service contract (Evidence A) asserted by the plaintiff is written only D as a party to the contract, but the name of the defendant is not written, and each statement of evidence Nos. 2 through 4 (including each number) is insufficient to recognize that the defendant is a party to the above service contract. Since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.