제주특별자치도설치및국제자유도시조성을위한특별법위반등
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 770" (Defendant A)
1. No person who violates the Special Act on the Establishment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Development of Free International City shall move or arrange for any foreigner who has not obtained permission to extend his/her sojourn area to another area of the Republic of Korea after entering Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (hereinafter referred to as the "Do") for tourism purposes without a visa;
On May 1, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant entered Jeju-do from the Defendant’s accommodation located in Jeju-si, to the construction site without a visa, entered Jeju-do for tourism purposes, and consented to the request by the Defendant to move Chinese residents, who did not obtain the permission for the extension of the sojourn area, to the G to the Gyeonggi-do. In response, the Defendant conspiredd with the Defendant with the name in the name in question by receiving KRW 3 million.
Defendant 1: (a) had the right to aviation in the name of a national for the Republic of Korea to a search officer, who had been in possession of the right to aviation in the name of a national for the Republic of Korea, at the third-class domestic departure search unit of the Jeju International Airport 3rd International Airport located at the Jeju Airport 2 around May 2, 2016 between Jeju Airport and Jeju Airport on May 2, 2016, at around 16:00.
At the time of presenting I's identification card, the above G attempted to pass through the search stand as I, but the above H reported to the police and was arrested as a current offender.
Accordingly, the Defendant entered Jeju-do tourism without a visa in collusion with the above name in order to have the foreigner who did not obtain permission for extension of sojourn area move to another area of the Republic of Korea, but failed to achieve such intent.
2. In the process of passing through the airport search stand in order to board the above G at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was required to present an identification card by H, who is an employee in the search stand in the place.
The defendant is an official document, which was in possession of the defendant, Jindo.