2. On August 23, 2013, the fact that the amount of fraud by the crime of this case was not specified as KRW 50 million; the damage was not repaid even after a long time has passed since the crime of this case; the co-ownership share of the land owned by the Defendant’s wife for the victim on August 23, 2013, which was before the indictment, was created a right to collateral security, but the damage was not actually repaid, and the victim still has been punished. In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.