Defendant A, on January 8, 2014, is sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months in the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court on the 16th of the same month and is still under the suspension of execution, which became final and conclusive on the 16th of the same month.

Defendant, C, and D are those who purchase stolen or lost mobile phones in the sports zone and sell and benefit from the sale of the stolen or lost mobile phones from sellers, and they are recruited to purchase a cell phone which is a stolen or lost object at the place of a contact.

At around 12:30 on February 6, 2015, Defendant, C, and D, under the contact that they sell stolen and lost mobile phones from E, and they purchased at KRW 2,80,000,00, a total of 6 mobile phones from E, such as Aphone 6, from E, by being aware of the fact that the vehicle in question is a stolen and lost mobile phone at the port of the wife population at the port of the port of the wife population at the port of the port of the destination where the vehicle is a place of contact, and the Defendant, C, and D, knowingly, purchased the vehicle in question at KRW 2.8 million.

In addition, from that time until February 11, 2015, Defendant C and C conspired with D and acquired stolens by purchasing a total of 19 cell phoness in the same manner as the attached list Nos. 1 and 2, such as the attached list Nos. 3.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Arrest photographs;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs of each seized article;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in cases of attaching six copies of investigation documents, such as suspect E, who is a seller of stolen goods);

1. Relevant Articles 362(1) and 362(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the defendant's cell phone acquisition, which is a stolen stolen by juveniles for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.