1. Interference with business of victims C;

A. At around 18:00 on November 10, 2014, the Defendant rejected the victim’s rejection of the Defendant’s refusal to enter the said cafeteria’s restaurant where the Defendant Da Da was under the influence of alcohol with severe malodor in body, and the Defendant’s refusal to enter the said restaurant for about 20 minutes, such as taking the Defendant’s hand away from the “Ecafeteria” operated by Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. C, and bringing the Defendant into the restaurant, thereby hindering the victim’s restaurant business by force.

B. On November 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00, around 12:12:00, the Defendant: (b) deemed that the Defendant would not arbitrarily take and sell the instant “E cafeteria”, which was drunk and displayed in the said “E cafeteria; and (c) that the victim would have caused others to feel, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by force by: (a) preventing the Defendant from having customers, who had frightd in the said cafeteria from entering the cafeteria by reporting the victim’s behavior and leaving the cafeteria; and (b) preventing them from having customers enter the cafeteria.

C. At around 18:00 on November 24, 2014, the Defendant rejected the Defendant’s rejection of Kimchi as to whether the Defendant was drunk in the “E restaurant”, and the Defendant would drink the victim. The Defendant’s refusal to enter the restaurant is a force by: (a) preventing the customers, who were able to enter the restaurant, from entering the restaurant for about 10 minutes, including, but not limited to, the cryption of the cryp; (b) hump at the entrance of the restaurant, “hump, hump, hump; and (c) hump, hump, hump, and hump. at the entrance of the restaurant.