beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.10 2017고정1395

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Persons whose accused and name are unknown are the members of the E church located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and F are the members of the above E church, and the victims G (the remaining and the age of 48) are the members of the above E church. From March 2017 to March 3, 2017, disputes have occurred due to the use of the church donation funds of the above E church, which is the members of the above E church, and are divided into the side and the opposing side that supports the above H pastor, and whose name is not known with the defendant and the above name is not known, the victim is the side that supports the above H pastor, and the victim objects to the above H pastor.

around 15:02 on June 2, 2017, the Defendant shared with F and a person whose name the above name is unknown, and, in order to prevent the victim from entering the church, laid the victim's body on the floor, laid the victim's body, laid the victim's body on the floor, put the victim on both arms, put the victim on the part of the above F and the person whose name is unknown on the part of the victim's arms, and divide the two arms into two arms, and put the victim into approximately two weeks of treatment for the victim.

Defendant

In collaboration with F and a person whose name is not known, the injured person was injured.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. A report on internal investigation (Submission of a medical certificate, etc.) and a medical certificate for injury;

1. Investigation report (a case to confirm the same image);

1. The defendant asserts that the defendant's act does not constitute a joint injury, since he did not have the intention or intent of assault or bodily injury to the defendant, and the defendant was only punished by a ditch after going beyond the floor with the care of the victim, and therefore the defendant's act does not constitute a joint injury.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the time when the victim was laid on the floor and the defendant, etc. was under the control of the victim is not short, and the victim suffered injury as stated in its reasoning in the process as follows.

In light of this, the defendant's act.