When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From October 2007, the Defendant, as the operator of the Internet Nene Da, had the position to support D, which was known to the Defendant while engaging in animal protection activities in the bulletin board, etc. of the above “C”. The Defendant was subject to punishment by raising suspicion that the Defendant embezzled the above “C” support from the victim E operating the animal protection center, and was subject to adequate appraisal by the said victim.

On the other hand, the victim F was aware of in the course of animal protection activities as the founder of the G organization.

"2017 Gohap 84"

1. On February 1, 2016, in the case of defamation via an information and communications network around February 1, 2016, the Defendant posted a document linked to the victim’s criminal history by “H” to “H,” and filed a complaint by defamation, the victim F was aware that the victim F’s testimony for E does not coincide with some of the testimony for E and the testimony for E.

The author tried to post comments on comments for the purpose of slandering the above victims.

피고인은 2016. 2. 1. 경 시흥시 I에 있는 주거지에서 휴대폰을 이용하여 위 피해자가 자신의 카카오 스토리 상에 “J” 이라는 제목으로 작성한 글을 보고 댓 글로 ‘K’ 라는 닉네임을 사용하여 위 게시 글에 댓 글로 “ 그래서 H 사건 때 L는 댁이 알려줬다고

하던데 댁은 M이 알려줬다고

under section 25(1)(2) of the title of this title, the title of this title, the title of this title

Boli-gu도요

ㅎㅎ 그 뒤 사건기록들 보니 코메디가 따로 없더구 만”, “ 쉴 드좀 에 지간히 치 쇼 서로 돌아가며 위증해 놓고 자신감 만 땅되신 것 같은데 ”라고 글을 게시하여 정보통신망을 이용하여 공공연하게 피해자 F의 명예를 훼손하였다.

2. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant posted a written article linking his criminal history to D with “H” and filed a complaint for defamation.