강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal by defense counsel (e.g., in a case where the Defendant was found to have committed a crime and reflects the wrongness, the Defendant committed a criminal act in this case by contingency under the influence of alcohol, and efforts to change damage, etc., the lower court’s sentence imposing orders to complete a sexual assault treatment program program for six months and forty hours is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime at a soup, when making soup, it is not good that the locked female sacrife recons the part of the victimized female and the part of the victimized female sacriffed by indecent act; (b) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment due to sex offense; (c) the Defendant had the record of criminal punishment due to sex offense; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the offense; and (e) other conditions of all the sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances asserted in the grounds for appeal, even if considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s punishment is not deemed unreasonable,
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.