If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant became aware of the victim B (n, 42 years of age, and name) through ‘C’, which is a mobile phone display, and became a space between the Defendant and the Defendant.

The Defendant and the victim, while making a telephone call, sent the sex pictures generated by the Defendant to the victim as text messages, and sent two video images consisting of the victim with a photograph of the self-defense body and the victim as a self-defense body.

When the defendant makes a telephone conversation, the relationship with the victim was caused by dial-a-mail, and the rapid victim prevented the defendant in D.

At around 21:40 on November 5, 2018, the Defendant sent the victim a word ‘C’ with the word ‘confising’ to the victim when the victim was prevented from blocking D, and threatened the victim with the video received by the victim as if the victim was not contacted.

B. On November 6, 2018, the Defendant, at Jeju, threatened the victim with a c’s video that received the victim’s instant message, “all photographic images and daily images,” while refusing the victim to accept the phone call from the victim within E on November 6, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related to B (tentative name);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a photograph of the contents of a DNA conversation exchanged between the suspect and the victim;

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.