특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around August 1, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) driving C motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.169% at a section of about 3km from the front of the Yando-Eup, Namyang-si, the Namyang-si, to the front of B, Namyang-si.
2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of C business kiki in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from hazardous driving).
On August 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of normal driving due to the influence of alcohol around 23:25 on August 1, 2020, and driven the three-lane road in front of the B in Southyang-si, along the one-lane road, the Defendant driven the said car at a non-speed speed from the border of the Republic of Korea to the ebbbbrence.
In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and there was a duty of care to ensure that the person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle should accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and to safely report the traffic conditions before
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the driving direction and tried to change the two-lanes to the two-lanes under the influence of alcohol, and the victim D ( South, 51 years old) who was proceeding on the two-lanes due to the negligence of trying to change the two-lanes to the two-lanes, and the left side of the E SP car driven by the Defendant, to the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, due to negligence in the course of duties driving a vehicle in which normal driving is difficult under the influence of alcohol as seen above, such as brain-dead sugar, etc. with no one in two open for two weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim F (F, 51 years of age) who was on board the said vehicle to require approximately two weeks of treatment, such as salt, tension, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1...