Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in credit business under the trade name B.

No debt collector shall engage in any conduct detrimental to his/her privacy or peace in his/her business by repeatedly speaking, writing, sound, image, or any other means without any justifiable reason, reaching the debtor or his/her related person to cause uneasiness.

Nevertheless, at around 21:31 on January 19, 2015, the Defendant said, “Around January 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that she was by telephone to the debtor C and did not perform his/her obligation at the time, the Defendant said that “I will only die in her inner face; (b) she was in her inner part; and (c) she would be her part of the money which he/she opened at the home; and (d) she would be her part of the meat; (b) she would be her part of the meat; and (c) she would be her part of the meat; and (d) she would be her part of the meat; and (d) she would be her part of the meat; and (d) she would be her part of the meatch f

In addition, from January 28, 2015 to January 14:00, the Defendant made a statement by telephone repeatedly in 11 times, such as the statement in the annexed crime list, with the intent to receive a claim from C, from January 28, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 15 (2) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and the Fair Collection of Claims elective from Punishments and subparagraph 3 of Article 9 of the Act on the Selection of Fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;