beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.08.26 2019고정108

명예훼손

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has been in office as the president of a division of the C organization B from June 15, 2018 to June 15, 2018, and the victim D was a former president of the B organization B from March 20, 2015 to December 20, 2018.

On August 1, 2018, the Defendant called “name” to approximately 3,650 members of the Mutual Association, including E, at an infinite place, and “The head of the Mutual Association may get a regular audit point from the F Organizations, and may be collected a penalty surcharge from the National Tax Service, and supplied two salts to the Mutual Association members in the year 2017. After the F Organizations’ audit, the Defendant collected a penalty surcharge of KRW 00 million from the National Tax Service due to a violation of the pointed out in the following: “I will commit an illegal act intending to comply with the principal’s pledge and cause damage to the Mutual Association.” “At the end of three years of the term of office of the head of the Mutual Association, the conflict between the executives, and the head of the Mutual Association and the head of the Mutual Association, etc. shall be notified to the end of that period, and at the end of June to July, 200 through the end of this year, I sent false mail to the head of the Mutual Association.”

However, there was no fact that the victim was audited by F organizations or collected penalty surcharges from National Tax Service on the ground that the victim provided salt twice in 2017 for its members without compensation, and around June 29, 2018 and the same year.

7.2. Around July 2018, the assembly that occurred before B was an assembly related to the election of a standing director of the B association, which was conducted on or around July 2018, and did not have relation to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant sent printed matters containing such false facts, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness D.