배당이의
1. Defendant . Of the distribution schedule prepared on November 6, 2015 by the said court with respect to the distribution procedure case of the Seoul Central District Court.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a person who holds a claim of KRW 700 million against S, an incorporated association (nameed as T, an incorporated association, December 4, 2014; hereinafter “Nonindicted Corporation”).
The non-party corporation deposited KRW 102,114,075 in this Court, 2014.
B. The court commenced the distribution procedure as to the above deposit money by R. The Defendants were entitled to preferential payment under Article 38 of the Labor Standards Act, Defendant B, C, and D from January 2012 to March 3, 2012 (Defendant B 6.6 million won, Defendant C15 million won, Defendant D. 6 million won in annual leave leave in 2010, Defendant E was also entitled to 62,960 won in annual leave leave in 201, and 796,120 won in annual leave leave in 201, and Defendant F was also 14,373,138 won in annual leave in 14,373,138 won in 6,688,053 won in Defendant G, and Defendant H was 38,702 won in 270,802 won in 200,306, 2006, 306, 2006, 2006, 306, 2006, 2000.
C. On November 6, 2015, the dividend court of Defendant B: (a) KRW 5,181,798 for Defendant C; KRW 11,776,815 for Defendant C; KRW 4,710,726 for Defendant D; KRW 1,129,852 for Defendant E; KRW 11,284,652 for Defendant F; KRW 5,250,931 for Defendant G; (b) KRW 30,047,208 for Defendant H; (c) KRW 18,616,989 for Defendant A; (d) KRW 2,35,363 for Defendant J; and (e) KRW 2,041,314 for Defendant N; and (e) KRW 2,415,032 for Defendant D; and (e) KRW 2,314,314 for Defendant C; and (e) KRW 2,414 for Defendant C; and (c) KRW 28418,2841,2848.
The Plaintiff appeared on the date of distribution, and stated an objection against the total amount of the dividend to the Defendants, and filed a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution with the instant court on November 12, 2015.
E. Defendant J died on June 7, 2016, and K, L, and M are the husband and children of Defendant J.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 8-1, 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is against the non-party corporation.