However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 09:00 on March 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) Mapo-si where the Victim B, C, and D reside together with, and (b) Mapo-si where D was suffering from disturbance on the ground that D does not satise himself; (c) although the Defendant demanded the Defendant to go, the Defendant did not comply with the demand, but did not comply with it; (d) “I am Mana and Ba Mana”, and she satis for about one hour and thirty minutes.

2. On March 6, 2014, at around 10:35, the Defendant, at the place of paragraph (1) of the same Article, proposed that a slope G belonging to the Bana Police Station, who was dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report on the fact that the Defendant spawd the above spath as above, should leave the place, saying, “I spawd that spawds will grow up to be spawd,” and carried spaths of the above G, and spawd down on the floor, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act that prescribes the applicable provision on criminal facts, the choice of punishment (the choice of imprisonment, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration of sentencing)

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. Determination of types of crimes: Type 1 of obstruction of performance of official duties;

2. Determination of the scope of sentence: Basic area, six months to one year and four months (no special person shall be punished);

3. Standards for handling multiple crimes: Application of only the lower limit because the sentencing criteria are not set for non-compliance with the eviction.

4. Determination of sentence and suspension of execution are recognized and against the defendant's mistake, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, and contingent crimes, not planned crimes;