The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the modified facts charged were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on justifiable acts, etc., or by misapprehending the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.