However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 1, 2016, at around 15:07, the Defendant driven a B B-type car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.280% at a distance of approximately 200 meters from the bus terminal in front of the bus terminal located in the Young-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gun, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, written consent to blood collection, reply to requests for appraisal, and reports on detection of a drinking driver;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime.

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [The punishment shall be imposed on a severe punishment in that the person drives a motor vehicle once again in spite of the fact that the person has already been punished twice in 2003 and 2014, although he/she had already been under the influence of drinking, he/she has to not drive a motor vehicle again; however, he/she is in depth divided while he/she is willing not to drive a motor vehicle again; there is no history of more severe punishment than the fine (five times); and all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the age

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;