A. 1) Plaintiff A and B real estate No. 1, 2, and 2) Plaintiff C are listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

A. On January 6, 2012, the Defendant leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet from Nonparty E (hereinafter “instant real estate”) at KRW 5,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 5,500,000.

B. On October 26, 2012, from E, from October 26, 2012, Plaintiff A and B succeeded to the status of E, each lessor, after purchasing the real estate No. 2 listed in the separate sheet No. 1, as well as Plaintiff C, with a monthly reduction of KRW 4,50,000.

C. However, the Defendant did not pay the rent more than twice thereafter, and the Plaintiffs notified that the lease contract was terminated on June 1, 2016 on the ground of the delayed rent.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry of Gap's 1 through 3 (including virtual number) and the purport of whole pleading

2. According to the facts acknowledged above, since the lease contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant was terminated on or around June 20, 2016, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate No. 1 in the attached Table No. 2 in the attached Table No. 3 to the plaintiff A and B, and to pay the plaintiffs the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 4,50,000 per month from January 21, 2016.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.