However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendant

B From September 2017, when Defendant A was invested in an amount equivalent to KRW 300 million from Defendant A, but was unable to repay, and Defendant A asked Defendant A to repay the said amount several times, and Defendant A sought to borrow money from Defendant C, which was known to the general public, but the victim did not borrow money on the ground that the expiration of the lease term of the real estate lease agreement for “E in Gangnam-gu, Seoul” operated by Defendant A at the time, is imminent.

The Defendants conspired to acquire money by deceiving the victim by arbitrarily preparing a real estate lease agreement with the extension of the lease term and presenting it to the victim.

1. On June 27, 2018, Defendant B entered “Seoul Gangnam-gu F,” “G,” “H”, and “name” in the form of real estate lease agreement in the name of the lessor in order to exercise it at an irregular place, and then sent the document to Defendant A by e-mail after affixing the seal under the name of J to the name of the proprietor. Defendant B sent the document to Defendant A by text message on the same day after completing the contract, stating the name, etc. of “K” on the lessee’s name, etc.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge and use one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of J, a private document on the duty of rights.

2. On June 27, 2018, Defendant A sent a forged lease contract to the victim as above at an influent place, and “I would provide the victim with food of KRW 5 million per month from F located in the actual owner E to KRW 30 million without compensation, if I borrowed money from the victim.”

However, as above, the above lease contract was a forged document by the defendants, and it was leased.