매매대금반환
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding or adding the following Paragraph (2) among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it
2. Of the instant sales contract, even if the instant sales contract did not correspond to the quantitative sale and purchase, and even if the Defendant’s duty of disclosure is not recognized, the part regarding the area exceeding 301 square meters in excess of the actual area of the instant forest is null and void as a matter of course. As such, the Defendant is obligated to return the sales price of the said 301 square meters as unjust enrichment.
In addition, the following circumstances are added. From 3th to 4th 19th 17th 17th 17th 17th 4th 19th 2th 2th 19th 2th 2th 20, “The Plaintiff, who operated a factory with the trade name of “O”, entered the sales contract in the separate sheet Nos. 4, 6th 4, 45, 15th 14th 14th 2th 200 on the purchase price of each real estate (the total size of real estate 13, 736th 4, 15.14th 2th 200 on the sale price of each real estate at the time of signing the sales contract with the Plaintiff, and the Defendant again entered the sales contract in the separate sheet Nos. 1,100 on each real estate at the time of signing the sale contract with the Plaintiff as KRW 1,00 on each real estate at the time of signing the sale contract with the Plaintiff.