양수금
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 51,830,904 and KRW 30,606,322 from March 9, 2017 to the date of full payment.
1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the evidence Nos. 1 to 5 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the facts in the separate sheet can be acknowledged. As such, the Defendant (former name B) is liable to pay the Plaintiff the money set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Disposition.
2. The defendant's assertion argues that the defendant's claim does not comply with the plaintiff's claim since the extinctive prescription of the loan claim of this case has already expired as well as the notification of the assignment of the claim
However, comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement Nos. 2 and 3, it is evident that the Plaintiff was entrusted with the power to notify the assignment of claims and notified the Defendant of the assignment of claims by means of content-certified mail on June 23, 2014. In particular, it is evident that the Defendant was served with the above documentary evidence during the instant lawsuit.
② In addition, according to the above evidence, it can be acknowledged that the national bank, the transferor of the claim, received the Busan District Court Decision 2007Da31804 Decided May 16, 2007, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2007. The plaintiff, the transferee of the claim, filed the lawsuit of this case on March 27, 2017, before the expiration of ten years of extinctive prescription under Article 165(1) of the Civil Act from the date when the above judgment became final and conclusive.
Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.