난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The details of the disposition are as follows: (a) short-term stay visit (C-3) on August 4, 2016 of the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea on August 4, 2016; (b) refugee status recognition application (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) August 29, 2016 of the date of the application for refugee status recognition application (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) the fact that there is no dispute over the determination of rejection of the decision of July 18, 2017 of the date of application for objection that the decision of August 29, 2016 could not sufficiently recognize the grounds for refugee status non-recognition: (d) the fact that there is no ground for recognizing the rejection of the decision of July 18, 2017 of the date of application
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Republic of Austria (hereinafter referred to as "Naria") of the Republic of Egbo (hereinafter referred to as "Naria") and a non-Afra in the East of Austria.
The plaintiff participated in a demonstration as a member of the IPB as an organization that requires non-AF's independence, and thereby has been arrested twice by the Austrian government.
As such, if the Plaintiff returned to Austria, it is likely that she would also be subject to gambling by the Austrian government, and thus, she should be recognized as a refugee.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or who, due to such fear, cannot return to, or does not want to return to, the country of nationality that had resided in the Republic of Korea before entering the Republic of Korea.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the entire arguments in Articles 3 and 5 and the purport of the arguments in Articles 3 and 5, the Plaintiff shall be subject to persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.