One kitchen that has been seized (30cm in total length, 19cm in length)(No. 1).

[Criminal Records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Cheongju District Court on March 16, 2016 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 24th of the same month.

1. Special intimidation (2016 Highest 358), the Defendant was a person who had a relationship with the victim C (M, 34 years of age) with the victim for a period of one year and six months.

On March 1, 2016, around 01:55, the Defendant had a fact that he made a rear in the place of the damage from the outside of the “E-Packing car” located in Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seo-gu.

Domination Doctrine Doctrine in living together

“Abrecing the horses,” indicating the kitchen knife (30cm in total length, 19cm in length, 19cm in length, 1) which is a dangerous object, and is equal to “abre with a width.”

The term "undertake" means the victim's timber, the kitchen knife is replaced by the victim's kitchen, and the victim's "pine" is continuously replaced by the victim in the same packing bus.

Does it go through and go to the past.

Chewing of the horses.

Does it be entered into a crime of fraud? Whether it is the same as a collapsed death.

“A kitchen with the kitchen in which the kitchen is located in the string.”

The present shows.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by carrying a kitchen, which is a dangerous thing.

2. Fraud (2016 Highest 546) The Defendant, on June 2015, came to know of the Victim H in the “GNaeg” located in Cheongju-gu, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju and maintained Y.

On June 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at a mutually influent restaurant located in the Gungdong-gu Bongdong-gu Bongdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (b) at the victim’s “I wish to construct the road on which the order is issued by the equipment company in construction operated inside and outside, and there is no money in the Company due to the delayed settlement of bills.

A false statement was made that the entertainment expenses will be repaid at the end of six months if the entertainment expenses need to be paid.

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate a construction-related equipment company at the time, did not have any particular property or income, and only thought that he/she borrowed money from the victim as living expenses, etc., and thus, he/she borrowed money from the victim.