However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 6, 2015, at around 00:0, the Defendant heard and found that D, the Defendant's fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flussium C District District of Busan City, which was located in B, Busan, had been voluntarily

In order to be asked about D from the border E belonging to the above C District E, the Defendant took a strong look at the above E face, and continued to tightly walked the body of E, walked the part of E, walked the part of the ship, walked the part of the ship, spath, spath, hand, etc., and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of each E and F;

1. A damaged photograph or CCTV video CD;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person who has been sentenced] [decision of sentence] The defendant appears to have the attitude of acknowledging and opposing the crime, the degree of the obstruction of official duties, and the fact that there is no criminal record.