A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for four months, for six months, for six months, for each of the defendants C and D.

(2).

Defendant A of 2016 J. 349 is a full-time employee who runs a vessel processing business, employing more than 130 full-time employees from the macro-si F to the (ju) G.

Defendant

A, from January 27, 2015 to March 6, 2015, worked as an entertainment worker at the above workplace, and on March 6, 2015, a retired worker H’s wage of 5,61,290 won in March 6, 2015, as stated in attached Table (2) No. 5 to 16,815,190 won in total of 12 employees’ wage and 828,000 won in attached Table (2) No. 12-28,00 won in each retirement allowance of 12-year workers, as stated in attached Table (2) No. 5 to 16,00, without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment date.

"2017 Highest 29"

1. Around May 2015, Defendant A discontinued his business and caused wages in arrears to workers, and accordingly, Defendant A urged employees to complete work after the closure of the company, or to communicate with his family members, with a view to raising an excessive application for a substitute payment without deducting the wages, after first settling all or part of the wages.

On May 3, 2015, Defendant A settled the amount of wages in arrears equivalent to KRW 3,90,000, which was 7,254,870 at the time of closure of a substitute payment, and Defendant A submitted a ledger of wages in arrears as if the wages in arrears were 7,254,870 won at the time of filing an application for substitute payment on December 2015, notwithstanding that the actual wages in arrears were 3,354,870 won.

As a result, Defendant A received an excessive substitute payment of KRW 3,525,00 from the Victim Labor Welfare Corporation on January 19, 2016 from the said I on the deposit account in the name of the said I on January 19, 2016 and received a substitute payment of KRW 52,85,800 in total for 32 employees on January 19, 2016, as shown in the attached crime list (3) in the attached Form.

2. Defendant B did not have worked in (State)G operated by Defendant A around May 2015.