However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On September 27, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court on February 21, 2014.

Around 14:40 on May 27, 2015, the Defendant driven a B-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act requires the defendant's drinking records (the defendant's drinking records (the person who has been punished three times due to a sound driving, who has no record of punishment or heavier than a fine), driving distance, blood alcohol concentration, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, circumstances of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case shall be determined as ordered.