However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Suwon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Suwon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on June 27, 2012, respectively.

On April 20, 2014, the Defendant, as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two or more times, driven B Poter trucks under the influence of alcohol by 0.256% in a section of approximately 1.5km from the front of the wife population, Kim Quantity apartment, Gambun apartment, Gambun apartment, and the front road of the same Permitted Elementary School. < Amended by Act No. 1272, Apr. 20, 2014>

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual status of a host driver;

1. Previouss before ruling: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, and investigation reports (the records of violation of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the reflective fact, and the fact that there is no record of punishment heavier than a suspended sentence due to the same kind of crime);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. The main sentence of Article 62-2 (1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2 (2) of the Criminal Act;