However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

1. On December 3, 2012, Defendant B appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s bodily injury to Cheongju District Court No. 622 at the Cheongju District Court No. 622, which was located in Cheongju-si, and took an oath.

The defendant responded to the question "I do not know about the fact that the defendant was in the vicinity of E in the process of smuggling by the defense counsel," and answer to the question "I have clearly seen the witness" of the defense counsel.

However, in fact, the defendant directly observed the face of D in the face of D due to drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On June 24, 2013, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s bodily injury to Cheongju District Court No. 621, which was located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and took an oath.

The Defendant responded to the question of “I see that the Defendant did not have any her face at all when the Defendant took a bath to E or take a drinking” by his defense counsel.

However, in fact, the defendant directly observed the face of D in the face of D due to drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Trial records;

1. Application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 152 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 153 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confession;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are the confessions of crimes, Defendant A is the primary offender, and the sentencing factors of the Defendants, such as the age, character and conduct, the environment, the circumstances of the crimes, and the circumstances after the crimes, etc., shall be determined as indicated in the disposition.