A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company that operates a wholesale and retail business for seedlings. 2) The Defendants are women, and Defendant B is the father of Defendant A.

C was the husband of the defendant A, and D was the father of the defendant A.

3) C is the wholesale and retail business of seedlings with the trade name “E” (hereinafter “instant business”).

(4) The Defendants and D have been living together with the “Cheongju-si Heung-gu,” which is the place of business of the instant case, since C died, Defendant A engaged in the instant business.

B. The Plaintiff’s supply of seedlings to Defendant A by July 2013, the Plaintiff supplied seedlings equivalent to KRW 30,173,000 to Defendant A. (2) Defendant A did not pay the Plaintiff a nursery, and the Plaintiff and Defendant A drafted the following payment note (Evidence A2) on July 26, 2013.

In other words, Defendant A’s payment of KRW 30,173,00 to the Plaintiff up to September 30, 2013. In other words, Defendant A’s payment of KRW 30,173,00 to the Plaintiff. If the promise is not fulfilled, no objection is raised in a legal lawsuit

3) On December 23, 2014, the Plaintiff notified Defendant A of the following: (i) “Defendant A paid KRW 6 million, which is a part of the price on April 17, 2014, and still did not pay the price for seedlings; (ii) the remainder of the price for seedlings is paid KRW 24,173,00,00.” (iii) Defendant A closed the instant business on December 18, 2014.

2) On December 18, 2014, Defendant B, the closure date of the foregoing business, was the same as the instant business and the location of the business, the type of the business, and the trade name, and completed the business registration by making the same as “E.” (3) around January 2015, Defendant B entered the E’s representative on the website (G) of E as Defendant B, and at the bottom of the “sendende”, the E deaf was written as Defendant A.

Defendant B, etc.’s business operation 1 Defendant A, the place of business of the instant business, Cheongju-gu H.