절도미수등
Defendant
The appeal is dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant, on October 12, 2014, did not interfere with the performance of official duties by assaulting police officers at the C C B bath parking lot located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu. On November 9, 2014, the Defendant did not assault the bus stops, H and I within the bus stops and the bus Nos. 312 located in the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, 414. < Amended by Act No. 12844, Nov. 9, 2014>
In addition, on December 8, 2014, the payment was made at L cafeteria, and it did not interfere with the execution of official duties by deceiving K by deceiving K, or by assaulting police officers dispatched upon receiving a report.
B. At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental disorder, etc. inflicted by suffering from the past from each of the instant crimes.
C. The sentence of unfair sentencing (ten months of imprisonment) by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. On October 12, 2014, the judgment of the court below on the charge of obstruction of the performance of official duties is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e.,: (a) police officer G received a report from the police officer, and requested the defendant to present an identification card by sending it to the site; (b) the defendant made a statement that "at the time when the defendant took a low face with a 1.5 liter of water containing any water stored on the parking lot floor in his/her bath theory," (iii) the police officer stated that "at the time when the police officer made a statement that "at the time when the defendant took a low face with a 1.5 liter of water contained in the parking lot floor," and (b) E, a witness, made a statement from the police officer to the date when the police officer made a statement that "at the same time he/she took a 112 report because he/she puts down the Defendant at the parking lot after taking a bath, and why he/she would comply with another person's evidence."