beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.03.28 2013고단2818

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 18, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seoul Western District Court, and on November 7, 2012, the Seoul Southern Southern District Court completed the enforcement of the sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 13, 2013, from around 02:00 to around 02:20, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s packing and massage business by force by forcing the victims and the denial of the victim to take a large look at the victim’s cryption, i.e., taking the victim’s cryption and drinking, i.e., taking the victim’s cryption from around 02:0 to around 02:20, because he was in front of the E Bank located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu (58 years old).

2. From June 13, 2013 to 02:50 on June 13, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim F, the victim F (the age of 71) was placed in the place specified in paragraph 1, on the ground that the victim does not have any fluorous fluoring fluoring fluoring fluoring on the part of the victim.

A. C. T. T. T. Z.

d. Embry

(i) the military service system;

"Absently taking a bath, etc." caused customers who have performed drinking at the same time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's packing horse business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness C and F;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. Statement of police statement related to C and G;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (verification of suspect repeated records);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of serving the sentence under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act several times of punishment for the same kind of crime and constitutes a repeated crime.