However, the reason is only the result of the first trial of the relevant case, which was in April 2, 2015, and only the fact that it could have been sufficiently asserted before the conclusion of the argument in this case.

The instant warden received on June 15, 2015, and the Defendant Company did not submit a written reply and did not attend the meeting on the date of pleading that was sent over four occasions.

(Korean Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448 delivered on December 9, 2015, 2015, etc. (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act). The Supreme Court Decision 201Da1329 delivered on May 1, 201, etc. (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiffs as the parties to the instant case leased part of five floors among the five floors of the building located in Daegu Suwon-gu D (hereinafter “instant hospital”). The Plaintiffs are deemed to have leased the five floors of the building.

) A person operating his business as a partnership. Defendant C leases part of the above floor and uses the skin room (hereinafter “the skin room in this case”).

(1) A person operating the company, Defendant Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Company”)

(C) Defendant C used in the skin room of this case (hereinafter “instant hot water meter”).

(2) On May 1, 2013, the occurrence of the instant fire and the occurrence of the Plaintiffs’ damages, around 00:10 on May 1, 2013, the fire was completely extinguishing at around 00:29 on the same day.

The fire of this case was caused by the interior and interior equipment of the skin room of this case, and the electric equipment of the building was damaged by fire, and damage was inflicted on the machinery and equipment of the hospital of this case and the interior equipment of the hospital of this case for 12 days.