beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단7077

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on October 9, 2007, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 3 years in October, 2007 for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Busan District Court.

Even if the Defendants were not the narcotics handler, they handled the narcotics as follows:

1. Defendant A

A. On October 11, 2015, at around 18:20, the Defendant received approximately 0.4 grams from F, a local mental medicine, which is a part of a disposable injection machine, from F, in front of the E bank located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, for free.

B. On October 11, 2015, at around 19:00, the Defendant provided B with approximately KRW 0.4g of the said oponon from the HMophone room located in Busan Dong-gu G free of charge, and received approximately KRW 0.2g of the said oponon from B at the same time at that place at that time at that time.

(c)

At around 19:00 on October 11, 2015, the Defendant administered phiphones in a way that the Defendant injecteds approximately 0.2g of the said phiphones into water at the toilet of the H telephones, and in a way that the Defendant injecteds the phiphones into his arms with a single-use injection device.

2. Defendant B

A. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant received from A about 0.4g of philophones contained in a one-time injection machine from A at the above H’s protection room, and provided A with approximately 0.2g of the said philophones free of charge at the above day-to-day border.

B. On October 11, 2015, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of the said penphones into water at the above H’s protection room on the 19:00, and administered them by means of injecting them into the Defendant’s arms with a disposable injection device.

(c)

around 14:00 on October 12, 2015, the Defendant administered approximately 0.1g of the instant penphones by the aforementioned method at the above H telephones room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Investigation report (the result of the Defendants’ emotional distress and maternity appraisal);

1. Currency details;

1. Investigation report (sopon medication);