방해배제 및 토지사용료지급 등
1. The Defendants’ appeal against the principal lawsuit of this case and the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff C’s appeal against the instant counterclaim.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation as to this case is that of the part concerning the defendants among the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[2] The judgment of the court of first instance on the fact that it is difficult to recognize the circumstances that need to change the scope of passage points as set forth in the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the respective descriptions of the evidence Nos. 8 through 12 (including the serial number) are shown in the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, is insufficient to reverse the facts of the judgment of the court of first instance on the fact that it is difficult to recognize the circumstance that the scope of passage points as set forth in the judgment of the judgment of the court of first instance should be changed, or all circumstances