When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant would lend the account used to reduce the amount of tax to a person who was in the name of the first police officer, and would provide KRW 3 million per month to a person who was in the name of the first police officer.

Around August 2017, at the same time, the Plaintiff lent its access media to Kwikset service articles with a promise to make a payment by delivering the physical card linked to the Defendant’s name bank (B) account at the entrance of the Matept in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government New-ro 97 New Dom Mtept, to Kwikset service articles, prior to the entry of the Matept.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on financial transaction information;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Optional fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking account of the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the wrong reasoning, the fact that there is no criminal history, and the living environment, etc.