However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around October 21, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) : (a) laid away drinking water, which is a dangerous object that had been released to a box at the entrance of the above restaurant, from the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D (Taking 52 years of age) of the Dong-gu Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and laid off to the “Ecafeteria”; (b) laid off the drinking water, which is a dangerous object that had been released to the box at the entrance of the above restaurant, and (c) caused the victim D to read “the harm caused by the report,” and (d) broken off the empty beer’s disease, etc. on the table.

The Defendant continued to use a shoulder beer disease, which is a dangerous object, as his hand, and threatened the victim F (26 years of age) and the victim G (26 years of age), who is a customer, with “F (26 years of age),” and threatened the victim with “Frash, dead, discarded down, flaging down, flaging, flading, and reporting.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried a drinking water disease or a shoulder beer disease, which is a dangerous thing, and threatened the victims.

2. On October 11, 2013, around 02:25, the Defendant: (a) intruded into a victim’s name in a non-fluorious area (hereinafter referred to as Ulsan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong; and (b) stolen the market

3. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant, entering a residence, going through a kitchen which was not corrected for the victim I’s house located in Ulsandong-gu H and the first floor, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and infringed on the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, G, and I;

1. A written statement;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. The Defendant’s defense counsel in the determination of the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the investigation report (report on attachment of thracks photographs that the Defendant stolen) and the Defendant alleged that the Defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability due to the depression that the Defendant was suffering from ordinary urbs at the time of committing the instant crime, and therefore, it is based on the trial records.