The defendant is the factory head of the D Company, and the victim E (the age of 46) is an employee of the D Company.

The Defendant, at around 09:30 on November 06, 2013, talked about the business schedule with the victim who is a workplace club in front of the entrance of the new building of the said DDD company, which was in Pyeongtaek-siF, had a height of the victim's speech on the ground that the victim did not follow the direction of his/her business, and had the wall that the victim was in his/her hands left on the ground floor after leaving the wall on the ground floor to another place, he/she suffered the injury in need of six weeks of the victim's treatment, such as the floth, floth, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 flothing the victim's floth, and cutting the floth, which was the upper part of the floor where he/she flothed the floth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's legal statement (a statement that there is the fact that the victim's shoulder and flaps are involved);

1. The part of the statement to the effect that the victim may go beyond the victim in the process of punishing spawn while making breath with breath in the police investigation record against the defendant.

1. A statement in the witness E’s legal statement that the defendant was able to catch breath and walk the witness, leading him/her the witness, and he/she was damaged by six caution on the wind that he/she goes beyond the clean state;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Answers to submit orders to the National Health Insurance Corporation;

1. Application of the law to a witness H’s legal statement to the effect that it was not deemed that the Defendant did not live in the body of the victim in light of the witness H, I, J, and the relationship between the Defendant and the Defendant, which is the head of the plant, and that it appears that the victim suffered an injury requiring six weeks of care, such as the right duplicating frame, etc., and that the victim’s legal statement to the effect that the same as the victim duplicatedd and dupliced, the victim’s legal statement to the effect that the victim was the same as the victim duplicatedd) and the fact-finding of the G hospital;

1. Article 262 of the Criminal Act, Articles 262 and 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and the sentencing of the sentence of imprisonment.