마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
On February 14, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on October 14, 2007, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on September 3, 2008, and was sentenced to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on February 12, 2010, and was sentenced to a one year and four months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on February 21, 201, and was sentenced to a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on July 21, 201, and was sentenced to a two-month imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Incheon Central District Court on February 21, 201, and was sentenced to a violation of the Act at the Seoul Central District Court on February 16, 2013 (or a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on February 16, 20.
Criminal facts
1. On May 19, 2016, the Defendant, in violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fluence), injected once, in a single-time injection method, putting in a single-time injection device a mert cancer panscopon (copon), which is a native mental medicine under Section A B101 of the Gyeyang-gu Building C at the Goyangyang-gu, Youngyang-gu, Jinyang-gu, Jinyang-gu, Seoul, and injected the Defendant’s arms.
2. On May 23, 2016, the Defendant attempted to intrude into the victim’s residence by: (a) around 08:10, the Defendant: (b) 102 and 6-story-dong apartment buildings D apartment buildings 102 and 6-story-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Youngyang-gu; (c) she was able to take an inside of the Defendant on the part of the victim E by reporting that the brush was installed in the state of being opened with the entrance of 607, the residence of the victim E; and (d) the Defendant attempted to intrude into the victim’s residence by opening the entrance, opening the door, cutting the brus, cutting down the brus, and cutting down the reading center; (c) however, the Defendant failed to bring the victim into an attempt without opening the door.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Witness E;
1. The Acts and subordinate statutes of the response requested for appraisal;