However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 6, 2016, at around 20:45, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the legitimate performance of duties of police officers in relation to patrol duties by assaulting the Defendant, who operated a sponsed vehicle without wearing a safety cap on the grounds that the mitigation of the police box belonging to the sponsing Police Station, which was on patrol duty in front of the Chuncheon bus terminal, “I am out of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am out of the sponsed, I am.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Work log and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes reporting on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act or more;