At around 01:30 on May 12, 2019, the Defendant returned home without complying with the victim’s drinking value requirement on the ground that he did not interfere with the treatment of simplified receipts for the drinking value in front of the “D” main point of the “D” operated by the victim C (the 69 years of age, leisure) in Bupyeong-si B, but the victim prevented the victim’s body and caused the Defendant’s arms with the Defendant’s arms, thereby cutting down the victim’s body over the floor, thereby leaving the victim’s body up to the bottom, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. A certified copy of the alleged suspect;

1. A report on the occurrence of violence;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the call investigation, victim currency, etc., and witness E-mail investigation);

1. Grounds for the applicable Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of the punishment for the crime, and the sentencing of the imprisonment alternative;

1. 양형기준에 따른 권고형량의 범위 ▷ 기본범죄(폭행치상) [권고형의 범위] 폭행범죄 > 제2유형(폭행치상) > 가중영역(6월~3년) [특별양형인자] 특별가중요소: 중한 상해(앞서 본 증거에 의하면, 이 사건 범행으로 인하여 피해자는 6주간의 치료가 필요한 오른팔 부위의 골절상을 입은 사실이 인정되고, 여기에 68세의 고령인 피해자로서는 완전한 회복이 어려울 것으로 보이는 점, 위 상해로 인하여 주점을 직접 운영하는 피해자가 주점영업에 상당한 지장을 받은 것으로 보이는 점 등에 더하여 보면, 이러한 상해로 인한 피해가 중한 것이라고 평가된다)

2. Determination of sentence: The defendant, in six months of imprisonment, has shown his attitude to make a confession and reflect all of the crimes of this case.

However, the crime of this case refers to the defendant's refusal of payment of the drinking value while demanding a receipt from the packing end operated by the victim.