beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.24 2017고단1173

근로기준법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

“The Defendant, on June 2, 2016, 2002, 2002,” to the Victim F, who became aware of in the E office of its operation on the second floor of the D Building in Daegu-gun-gun D, 2016, through a construction fair, “I leep the Defendant into a house with a G brick with a pro-friendly environmental cohesion effect on the part of the Party.”

“.........”

However, the fact is that the defendant had no intention or ability to construct G brick housing because he had been willing to use his personal debt repayment and living expenses, etc. as the construction cost received from the injured party at the time.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, entered into a housing construction contract with the victim with a total contract amount of KRW 160 million, which is KRW 100 million, and thereafter, on June 3, 2016; and KRW 28 million on June 7, 2016; and

7. The 29.18 million won was remitted for each contract price and the total of 66 million won was acquired through deception.

"2018 Highest 197" Defendant is a person who engages in a building-sale business, etc. under the trade name of "E" in Daegu-gu H 201 Dong 102.

On November 8, 2014, the Defendant stated to the Victim C that “Around November 8, 2014, the Defendant could not easily seek construction materials, such as G bricks (natural yellow sand bricks) from Germany, and that “Around the Republic of Korea, the Defendant would provide the Victim C with support for the region of Jeju-do and the construction technology of natural yellow sand bricks, etc., because the Defendant has a general sales right on the G bricks (natural yellow sand bricks) of Germany.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a general sales right in the Republic of Korea with respect to G bricks of Germany, so even if he received a franchise fee from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to grant the victim the right to operate or sell the Jeju area with respect to G bricks of Germany.

In the end, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and obtained the delivery of KRW 30 million from the victim to the victim on November 20, 2014.