2. Although the Defendant repeatedly committed the instant crime during the period of a repeated crime of imprisonment with prison labor sentenced to the same crime, the Defendant’s depth reflects the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime; the damage caused by the instant crime is minor and the damaged goods were returned to the victim; and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit, on the grounds that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.