However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 19, 2013, from around 22:25 to 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant made it difficult for the Victim E, a security guard, to make a serious threat to the Defendant’s disturbance on the ground that he reported the Defendant’s disturbance to the police around February 2013 to the police, and on the ground that the Defendant’s disturbance is bad, the Defendant made it difficult to avoid disturbance.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s apartment patrol and management by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 314 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that there are many criminal records such as the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, Defendant shall be sentenced to severe punishment; however, Defendant shall be sentenced to criminal punishment; and Defendant shall be sentenced to punishment as ordered in consideration of the fact that there is no criminal record other than fine until now after the suspended sentence was sentenced on 191.