대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.
2. Appeal;
1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The plaintiff's conjunctive claims added by this court are as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the determination as to the conjunctive claims added by this court under paragraph (3). Thus, they are cited by the main sentence
2. The height of the judgment of the court of first instance in the same part shall be the second 16th mal. "35 million won" with the loan of 35 million won.
The second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance is 20th, "The plaintiff is founded upon the request of the defendant," and "the defendant is founded upon the request of the plaintiff."
The 6th page 5 of the first instance judgment "Contact is the defendant's account route" is called "the contact and the defendant's account route".
3. Judgment on the plaintiff's conjunctive assertion
A. The plaintiff's conjunctive assertion that if the plaintiff did not lend 35 million won, which he remitted to the defendant on June 16, 2006, to the defendant, the defendant shall be deemed to have profit without any legal ground. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay 35 million won as unjust enrichment and delay damages to the plaintiff.
B. There is no dispute as to the fact that the plaintiff remitted 35 million won to the defendant's account on June 16, 2006.
However, in light of the various circumstances seen earlier, it is difficult to view that the Defendant took advantage of the above money without any legal ground merely because the Defendant did not directly borrow the money from the Plaintiff, which was remitted to the Defendant’s account, and there is no evidence to prove otherwise that the Defendant took advantage of the said money without any legal ground.
Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.
4. If so, the plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim added in this court are all without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.