If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

B On September 17:15, 2020, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a rocketing car, was driving the said car on the ground of the tin-on road located in the tin-dong in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the above road was driven from the front intersection of the tin-dong to the wheel-do.

Since the place has a crosswalk where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to observe the signal to the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle and to prevent the accident from being done well by the person who is engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and followed the Defendant’s failure to pass the crosswalks from the left side of the Defendant’s front side to the right side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, which led to the Defendant’s failure to go against the vehicle stop signal, and shocked the victim C (38 years old), D (35 years old), and D (35 years old) into the front part of the left side of the rocketing car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim C with the right-free knee-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a survey report on de facto condition, a vehicle boom-fluor photograph and a photograph to cover a fluore image;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the damage resulting therefrom, are not provided for in the Criminal Procedure Act.

Recently, traffic accidents are frequently caused.

However, the defendant is recognized as committing a crime and is against the law.

statement is made.

There is no criminal history exceeding a fine and agreed with the victims.

The age, gender, and administration of the defendant.