When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 5, 2013, the Defendant became aware of the victim D who is engaged in the business of selling functional clothes and cosmetics through C, a branch office around December 5, 2013, and proposed that he/she be engaged in the business of the victim and appointed as a general director of the business of the company operating the victim by introducing himself/herself as a food distribution expert, and then the Defendant was in charge of the business of the port office.

On March 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s telephone at the port of call, and (b) lent KRW 10 million to the victim’s office to raise the company’s sales; and (c) paid money within three months.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendant used both the 18.2 million won and the 1.8.2 million won and the 1.3 billion won and the 4,000 won and the 40.4 million won and the 18.0 million won and the 4.0 million won and the 18.0 million won and the 4.0 million won and the 1.0 million won and the 4.0 million won and the 4.0 million won and the

Accordingly, on March 19, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained money from the victim to a new bank account (F) with the Defendant’s wife E on March 19, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. G certification;

1. A remittance statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to the payment of suspect's allowance to submit a complainant), a report on investigation (related to the verification of rent of a distribution center of the suspect distribution center), and a report on investigation (related to the fact that the deposit of the suspect distribution center is refunded four million won);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;