2. It is reasonable that there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant, who made the judgment, shows the attitude of acknowledging and reflecting his mistake, and that all the victims have agreed with them.

However, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant repeatedly committed a crime, such as injury, damage to property, intimidation, interference with business, etc., against many people, and repeatedly used the force of fear. Some victims have carried a knife or dangerous object and prevented them from committing a crime. In light of the content and result of the crime, the method and risk of committing the crime, etc., the liability for the crime is not weak.

In addition, the defendant has been sentenced to a single sentence, a two-time suspension of imprisonment, and a 14-time fine due to violent crimes. In particular, on February 20, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a one-year and six-year suspension of execution, and three-year suspension of execution, and was sentenced to a three-time suspension of execution, and committed the crimes such as insult, damage of property, interference with business, special assault, etc., and again committed each of the instant crimes even after being sentenced to a three-time suspension of execution.

In light of the above circumstances favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable since it is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.