임차보증금반환
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
[Claim]
The plaintiff, on August 16, 2010, has no dispute between the parties, or according to the statements (including the provisional number) in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the oral argument, on August 16, 2010, the plaintiff acquired the ownership of the above building on October 27, 2014 on the ground of sale on October 31, 2014, acquired the ownership of the above building on the ground of the plaintiff's KRW 35 million, the period of lease until August 28, 2012 (2) and acquired the above security deposit and the fixed date was granted as of September 10, 2012; the lease was terminated by agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant on the termination of the lease; the lease was terminated by agreement between the plaintiff and the director on December 27, 2017.
According to the above facts, the defendant who succeeded to the lessor's status as to the leased part of the building of this case is obligated to pay to the plaintiff a deposit of KRW 35 million and damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from September 4, 2018 to the date following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the plaintiff.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.